• HandsomeDevil
    link
    fedilink
    -259 months ago

    You’d be surprised to find out that it’s way more than 15 people. I’ve personally known at least a dozen who immigrated to the UK just because of the welfare system and they’d abuse it by getting paid for sitting on their ass all day.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      359 months ago

      You absolutely do not.

      I was an audiotypist for benefit fraud interviews for many years. My partner at the time worked in the BDC. I’m also a first generation immigrant. What I’m trying to say is that you absolutely are talking out your arse.

      I can assure you that even if anyone immigrates to the UK, the road between stepping foot in the country and being able to claim benefits is long and complex.

      Why would you even lie?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -209 months ago

        A lot of EU migrants have easy access to benefits. And people from Eastern Europe know how to live frugally (source: I’m one of them). Living on benefits in the UK is easy, benefits are bigger than average salaries in many Eastern European countries, housing is also covered, so you’re getting shit loads of money doing absolutely nothing. I know a person from my country, who migrated to the UK, got furloughed during the pandemic, then spent some time on UC while constantly travelling across Europe for fun, now she bought a flat in her home country and moved back. Buying a flat while living on benefits, isn’t that a dream?

        The benefits system in the UK is ridiculous. It doesn’t help those in need, but allows a lot of people to defraud the system and milk it for cash.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          189 months ago

          Truly amazing. You’re doubling down.

          Tell me ‘fellow migrant’, what length of time must you have been living in the UK, on what terms of immigration, and what stipulations must be fulfilled before a claim can be made (that will be processed and NOT automatically declined) by the Department for Work and Pensions.

          If someone was furloughed, then they weren’t on UC. Also, I had to travel back to my home country during the pandemic because my mother died from covid and I’m an only child. I had been claiming UC at the time and my benefits were stopped while I was there because I left the country for more than 30 days.

          The more you carry on with this lie, the more evident it is that you have zero idea what you’re talking about.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -209 months ago

            The only one lying here is you, mate. You didn’t even read my comment properly, there’s nothing to discuss here.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              199 months ago

              A stupendous attempt to save face.

              I am completely open to debate your claims factually. However, it looks like the facts don’t support your little narrative. So it’s probably a good idea for you to throw in the towel now.

    • SbisasCostlyTurnover
      link
      fedilink
      English
      309 months ago

      I mean I’ll happily have a debate about the merits of UBI in a world where we’re rushing towards mass unemployment, but that’s aside it’s a very very small segment of people on welfare who are “playing the system”.

      It’s bullshit rhetoric designed to get people shouting down at the poorest in our society whilst the richest get away with stealing from us all.

      • HubertManne
        link
        fedilink
        29 months ago

        UBI changes the game too though as you don’t lose if if you are working. Its always there so you don’t have to navigate a beurocratic process instead of being able to look for work.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          79 months ago

          Plenty would happily work “a bit” or “in some way”, but there’s not a lot in the system to support assisted/flexible/partial working etc.

          If you have injuries, ailments, illnesses, they’re still asking you to work 40 hours or go fully on sick, rather than supporting a “however many hours you can manage” and a small topup to maintain a basic standard of living.

          These used to be part of the system, in the earlier part of the “working tax credits” era.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              69 months ago

              I’m sorry to hear that - and I don’t doubt they exist, but i don’t think it’s in the numbers that sometimes get portrayed, more in “statistically irrelevant” sort of numbers - though it will depend vastly on where you live in the country. I’m sure it’s a visible problem in some specific areas or communities.

              However, I also think people (and the job centre) should be picky about the work people are applying for, at least for a while. This was also formerly part of the system, where they pretty much gave you a year of looking for relevant work, before enforcing other options.

              When someone better qualified (like when a large employer in an area suddenly closes) is forced to do an entry level job, especially through one of those “supporting you back to work” scams, where you work 40 hours in exchange for your dole & landlord benefit (i.e. working for ~£3 an hour) - you’re blocking all the entry level work from people who can currently only apply to it.

              Personally, I’d rather let the handful of gleeful scroungers skip joyously down the road with their £70 in hand and do nothing, than punish millions of genuinely struggling people “just in case”.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  59 months ago

                  Unless anything magical has happened in the last few years, I still live in one of the “worst” inner city places to be in the UK for income, employment, crime and reputation etc (i.e. you can still buy a 3 bed terrace on my street for less than £100k) - but, yes, I’m probably only ten minutes walk away from a “nice bit”, and the “worst bit” is over a mile away, in a direction I generally don’t need to go in - but it’s definitely no leafy village :)

                  Regardless, I do know what you mean - I think I just look at it more optimistically (or naively) and assume the best in everyone.

                  I used to do work with community groups round here (and in the “worst bit”) so I was constantly meeting and working with desperate people trying their best, but being shat on by the world/benefits system - so obviously my view is skewed a bit in favour of those who’d turn up to such things - and I’m not going to meet any of those that truly don’t care.

                  I’ll accept my numbers are likely a bit off and biased, but I still feel The “scrounger” number is tiny compared to the genuinely struggling.

                  The difference between my time on the dole (~18 years ago) and my partner’s time on the dole (~7 years ago) is astonishing. I was respected and supported to set up my own business. She wanted to do the same but was treated like a criminal.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              19 months ago

              You’ve brought your father up a couple of times in this thread. It feels like you’re projecting a bit.

              I get having a shit dad, but not everyone is the same