The majority of U.S. adults don’t believe the benefits of artificial intelligence outweigh the risks, according to a new Mitre-Harris Poll released Tuesday.

  • Billiam
    link
    fedilink
    English
    201 year ago

    People don’t play basketball because Michael Jordan exists?
    People don’t play hockey because Wayne Gretzky exists?
    People don’t paint because Picasso exists?
    People don’t write plays because Shakespeare exists?
    People don’t climb Everest because Hillary and Norgay exist?

    Are you telling me because you’re not the best at everything you do, nothing is worth doing? Are you saying that if you’re not the first person to do a thing, there’s no enjoyment to be had? So what if the singularity means AI will solve everything- that just means there’s more time for leisurely pursuits. Working for the sake of working is bullshit.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      People don’t play basketball because Michael Jordan exists? […]

      Problem is: That’s one guy, far away and rather expensive if you want them in your team.

      AI in contrast will be ubiquitous, powerful and cheap, and do whatever you want from it. That’s way harder to resist that, especially once you have a generation of people that have grown up with it and for which that is the new normal.

      • Billiam
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        I think you might have misunderstood my point.

        The OP was asking why, in a world where AI can think smarter and faster than humans and thus do everything a human could do but better, would humans do anything at all? I was pointing out that, pragmatically speaking, that’s already the case- plenty of people do activities they’re not the best at because the act itself is what brings enjoyment.

        Using OP’s logic, because Michael Jordan is the greatest basketball player (or Chamberlain, or Bryant, or James, or insert whoever you think is the best) no one should be motivated to play basketball. And yet, lots of people still do, which means his premise- that people are only motivated to do things either because they’re the best at it or they can meaningfully advance the field- must be flawed.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          And yet, lots of people still do

          Yes, but they do them because all those famous basketball people are distant and unreachable. Which allows them to still be competitive in their own local neighborhood. What if Michael Jordan, Chamberlain, Bryant and James are your neighbors? You will always lose the game, always perform worse than them and there is zero hope to even get anywhere near their level of performance.

          The whole motivation to do a task takes a dive when you know you will fail and never get to a level where you get acceptable results. And yes, basketball might not be the best example here, but painting, writing, music, programming? What motivation have I left to write my own story when AI can write my own stories better and faster than me?

          We already see the start of that today on Twitch, where artists draw something live on stream and than somebody comes in, takes a screenshot and finishes it before they do. That’s going to be the new normal and there will be generations growing up with that level of technology.

          Or look at all the kids that no longer go outside to play in the mud, but stay home to play video games. Having tech around changes our behavior.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      That’s all well and good, but I’m talking about a world where you have ZERO chance at being the best at anything, or even being able to make any meaningful contribution to the field.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        Being the best and making contributions is overrated. Eating curry noodles and exploring the world around me is where it’s at. People shouldn’t have to aspire to be a historical figure in order to feel like they’re leading a fulfilling life.

      • snooggums
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That applies to 99% of humanity right now, either due to personal abilities or circumstances that keep them from reaching their potential.

      • Franzia
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        Dog I’m not even the beat in my town at anything what are you on about

      • Billiam
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Are you the best basketball/baseball/hockey/$SPORTS_BALL player on the planet? If so, cool- can I get your autograph?

        If not, why even play basketball/baseball/hockey/$SPORTS_BALL? Do you play basketball/baseball/hockey/$SPORTS_BALL not because you’re the best, but because it’s theoretically possible that every single basketball/baseball/hockey/$SPORTS_BALL player better than you might all simultaneously might die, leaving you as the best on the planet? You solely enjoy activities because it’s technically but not practically possible that you would be the best ever, or “make meaningful contributions” to the sport? Or do you play just because the experience of playing is fun?

        If someone told you that rock-climbing is fun, would you decide you’re never going to do it because someone else already did? Or would it make you more likely to try it, because you want to know what that experience is like first-hand? You’re ascribing nihilistic motivations to humanity that even you don’t really believe in.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        But you might be the best between humans. Humans will still have competition only between themselves.