• @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      10
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Yes. And “accepting” doesn’t mean love bombing for purposes of conversion, like evangelism/da’wah (only to reveal the nasty tenets after initiation into the group). And acceptance with the fundamental belief that women are subservient to men in some fucked up sense of divine order is not acceptance. If someone wants to call this an Islamophobic dog whistle, they need to get their hearing fixed.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      910 months ago

      The thing is, every culture has rightwing extremists that want to exploit that.

      I’m not aware of a single one that’s all rightwing extremists, and any large enough is going to have some.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      610 months ago

      I think this is a very bad idea and leads to bad places.

      The culture in China is extremely insular and the Chinese state is very focused on homogenising the country into a single culture.

      Should Chinese people be not allowed to move out of China?

      I think discriminating on immigration based on ethnicity is an appalling idea, even if it means that sometimes a person from a bad country immigrates to where I live.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          710 months ago

          A person can see a dog whistle and know it for what it is without being able to hear it. Also it’s not only dogs who can hear dog whistles; some people just have exceptionally good hearing.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          110 months ago

          Or a former dog. I can remember the days of Bush Jr. regularly dog whistling to Evangelicals in his addresses, and unless you were a fundie or a former fundie, you would have no idea that his speeches had built-in supersonic Jesus whistles that only the evangelicals and evangelical survivors could hear.