The actor told an audience in London that AI was a “burning issue” for actors.

The actor told an audience in London that AI was a “burning issue” for actors.

  • @[email protected]English
    2•1 year ago

    That’s not reproduction of content so isn’t a copyright violation. Not shouldn’t be. Literally right now is not.

    The whole reason people are so up in arms about this is that we do not currently have laws or even standards that accurately police this kind of thing.

      • @[email protected]English
        2•1 year ago

        I am describing the current situation. You are the one describing events you hope to occur.

              • @[email protected]English
                1•1 year ago

                That you think I am defending the people using Fry’s voice here is just further confirmation that you don’t understand what I’m saying.

                I’m saying there aren’t laws or standards that accurately restrict this usage, and that is a bad thing and why people are upset.

                  • @[email protected]English
                    2•1 year ago

                    Here is current precedent:

                    This isn’t the first time technology and copyright law have crashed into each other. Google successfully defended itself against a lawsuit by arguing that transformative use allowed for the scraping of text from books to create its search engine, and for the time being, this decision remains precedential.

                    Please explain, in your view, the substantive differences.

                    Quote from here: https://hbr.org/2023/04/generative-ai-has-an-intellectual-property-problem