StrikerM to Lemmy [email protected] • 1 year agoBillionaire grindsetlemmy.worldimagemessage-square51arrow-up1395arrow-down172
arrow-up1323arrow-down1imageBillionaire grindsetlemmy.worldStrikerM to Lemmy [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square51
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink62•1 year agoBut in this case it does, or at least it should, since the IQ scale is based on a normal distribution which is symmetric along the mean.
minus-squaredadarobotlinkfedilink1•1 year agoBut wouldn’t a certain amount have the same ig right at the median, meaning less than half would actually be above (and also below)?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•1 year agoIt depends on if we assume a discrete or continuous distribution.
But in this case it does, or at least it should, since the IQ scale is based on a normal distribution which is symmetric along the mean.
Happy data scientist noises
Dang, you are right
But wouldn’t a certain amount have the same ig right at the median, meaning less than half would actually be above (and also below)?
It depends on if we assume a discrete or continuous distribution.