• Platypus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    9
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I’m curious what uses you have in mind–anything that’s an online competitive (i.e., you compete against other players–doesn’t need to be esports sweaty) game I don’t think there’s a strong case for allowing injected code, since that’s an avenue for gaining an unfair advantage and thereby worsening other players’ enjoyment, and anything offline I can’t see it being worth a company’s time and money to prosecute.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Well Nintendo are very litigious they already DMCA’ed a Zelda Breath of the Wild multiplayer mod. (As in it made the single player game multiplayer)

      I really wouldn’t want them to have more power to hurt their fans.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1510 months ago

        The solution is to not be a Nintendo fan.

        No, seriously. You support their draconic practices by buying their games.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          This. Nintendo is one of the least ethical videogame companies out there. Even when they come up with something new and innovative, it’s so locked down you’re better off waiting to play someone else’s copycat of it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1210 months ago

      I agree. Competitive games and code injection don’t mix but for those that are not competitive (i.e. minecraft), code injection is important.

    • Maestro
      link
      fedilink
      1010 months ago

      I think the problem is that the ruling now establishes that overlays and injected code are a copyright violation. Therefor any overlay or injected code is now illegal unless you have permission from the authors if the game.