• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    49
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I really expected more

    I’m sorry, but why? Why do people do this every time a new game comes out? This is what Bethesda does, and Microsoft isn’t much better.

    Every new game it’s like people forget what these companies do.

    You should’ve expected a Bethesda game.

    Btw elder scrolls 6 will suck, too.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 year ago

      It’s crazy.

      Bethesda have owned id Software, the best graphics engineers in the business, for a decade. They now even have Microsoft money. This is still, somehow, the best they can do.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        121 year ago

        No it is not the best they can do. I haven’t played starfield yet, but it should be obvious that no company with shareholders to whom they need to answer is ever going to do “the best they can do”.

        That isn’t even their target, at least not overall. Their target is maximum profitability. Putting forth maximum effort for the best graphics is not going to result in max profits, so they were never going to do that.

        And that’s to say nothing of the fact that graphical showcases just aren’t what Bethesda does in the first place. No one should have expected that. This isn’t an id game.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          No one’s asking for a “graphical showcase”. I’m sick of people defending Bethesda by saying that’s just what they do. Literally the only company I see people trot this line out for.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I don’t care about Bethesda. As I said I didn’t even buy or play this game. Sorry about the wording.

            I just feel like it’s asinine to say things like “is this the best they can do?” when literally no company puts out their best. And it’s asinine to say things like “but they own id software” when id isn’t the developer making this game. And it’s asinine to expect a company whose games have made gobs of money and sold tens of millions of copies not being a graphical showcase having above average graphics, because why would they suddenly spend time and effort on something they haven’t had to do before and still had success?

            Focusing on wording is nitpicking. I’m quite sure you understood my point.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Starfield…doesn’t suck though.

      I’ve sunk 20 hours into it so far and it’s amazing. You people just have your expectations up the ass for a company that is great at one formula and expect them to do the other when they never said they would. It’s ya’lls fucking fault for expecting No Mans Sky to be the greatest fucking game of all time at release over a company that made fucking Joe Danger.

      Cyberpunk 2077 I can understand more as it was made from the guys who made The Witcher 3, so feature wise I can understand the betrayal and they fucked up by lying to us. But it’s still ya’lls fault for expecting it to not be buggy and broken as fuck when it was delayed 3 fucking times. The red flags were there, and you STILL bought it.

      Oblivion and Skyrim have the same basic formula with little differences sprinkled in here and there mechanics wise that make it feel different, but familiar. Starfield is the same way and I fully expect ES 6 to do the same. But that’s fine. I don’t want anything groundbreaking. I just want Skyrim but with modern graphics, animations, different setting, and some new mechanics.

      Good god you people are negative.

      • tal
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s ya’lls fucking fault for expecting No Mans Sky to be the greatest fucking game of all time at release

        Yeah, having read over a bunch of comments here, a lot of the comments that are unhappy about Starfield are basically people expecting it to be like No Man’s Sky, or some people who just don’t like Bethesda games in general. The ones that are happy tend to be people comparing it to earlier Bethesda games that they liked.

        I really like Bethesda games, so for me, that’s great. But I do also get that there are people who don’t like Bethesda games, and for those people, being told that they’re wrong and that they should like it drives them nuts.

        I think a good rule of thumb is to probably expect Starfield to be similar to earlier Bethesda games, like Skyrim and Fallout 4. If you like those games, you’ll probably like Starfield. If you dislike them, you’re probably going to dislike Starfield.

        But trying to convince people who really like Bethesda games that they suck or to convince people who really dislike Bethesda games that they’re great is kind of not likely to work well.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        This happens with every Bethesda release because they overhype their games and keep their PR vague enough that people can fill in the gaps any way they want to. They’ve been doing this since Morrowind. This review/user response controversy is nothing new and neither are the usual criticisms of Bethesda games half-assing everything from accessibility to writing to various gameplay elements.

        And then instead of holding Bethesda accountable for their nonsense the fanboys like you go out and attack and blame other fans for it. Getting really sick of Bethesda fans shitting on anyone with criticism of their precious game company while whining about how toxic gaming culture is with zero self-awareness.

        If you’re ok with Bethesda never innovating that’s fine, but stop trying yti shut down other people’s valid criticisms or acting like they’re stupid for expecting and wanting higher quality releases.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Overhype? Please give me an example of overhyping. That whole, “See that mountain? You can climb it” meme was legitimately true. And he actually said you can WALK to it. Misquote. So there’s one debunked.

          And no, they really don’t keep their PR vague. They had a fucking 40 minute direct all about the game several months before release. How much more specific do people need it to be? Anyone who has ever played a Bethesda game knows what to expect. And even if you haven’t, it doesn’t take fucking rocket science to just analyze the game and figure out how it works by using your god damn ears and eyes when watching the direct/gameplay trailers. They’re not blatently lying like Hello Games did. They flat out showed the cutscene system when landing and taking off, and even Todd himself said there would be loading screens in several interviews.

          neither are the usual criticisms of Bethesda games half-assing everything from accessibility to writing to various gameplay elements.

          So the entire writing is half assed in Skyrim? Really? Even though it’s extremely memorable, the Dark Brotherhood questline is still considered among the greatest they’ve ever written, and Morrowinds story is considered GOAT to this day?

          I can absolutely understand Fallout 4. That was a major step back and I do not like that games story. It was boring and generic, along with the dialogue. Fallout 3 was a bit better but not by much. But seriously? Every single Bethesda Game? As for gameplay elements you’ll have to be more specific.

          Getting really sick of Bethesda fans shitting on anyone with criticism of their precious game company while whining about how toxic gaming culture is with zero self-awareness.

          If you’re ok with Bethesda never innovating that’s fine, but stop trying yti shut down other people’s valid criticisms or acting like they’re stupid for expecting and wanting higher quality releases.

          Bethesda has plenty of things in their games to critique. Nobody is denying that. I already critiqued earlier. And I don’t have a problem with criticism. My issue is when people critique a NEW game they haven’t even fucking played yet based off of things that existed before in previous games, or just a vertical video recording leak. And then better yet, playing the game and just scraping the barrel for the littlest shit, quirks, to call it “garbage” because it’s tradition and they want to feel validated and big. That’s not critique. That’s just being a fucking idiot.

          If you don’t like Bethesda games, fine. I think the majority of people who are bitching anyway are just folks who don’t like them to begin with. Which makes even less sense as to WHY they feel the need to. Bottom line, you don’t got to like Starfield or any Bethesda game, but come up with some legitimate arguments first. And most importantly, JUST DON’T FUCKING PLAY IT.

          Other than that, I fail to understand why people want to shit on Bethesda nowadays and act like the games are complete trash when they’ve won 4 game of the year awards already. So if you have any legitimate criticism, please feel free to add to it. Please explain why Bethesda is just a trashy company apparently.

          Edit: That’s what I thought.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 year ago

            I mean dark brotherhood is literaly the only thing i even remember from skyrim and not even beacuse of the questline but beacuse of the ability to kill the kidnaper and raid the brotherhood( and the music. The music in skyrim was amazing or at the very least very iconic ). Never finished Skyrim myself beacuse i just got bored at some point. In essence times have changed and they cant really make the same game over and over again. They need to innovate in a more meanigfull way. And that seems to be the main point of criticism. i myself havent played nor do i intend to since at least until i get an xbox or better pc. And probably even then i wouldnt play it . I prefer more story heavy rpgs like dragon age or witcher.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I prefer story heavy RPGs

              They need to innovate

              Dude, I’m sorry, but what the fuck is this? Bethesda games have always been story heavy. I’ve put 23 hours into this game so far and have seen combat maybe once an hour because I get so sucked into the story and lore. The same happened for Skyrim the more I played. I’m sorry it wasn’t memorable for you for whatever fucking reason, but the fact that the game and its story has been memed to death and is still talked about means it’s clearly memorable. Fuck me even Oblivion was arguably much more story heavy, and I LOVE that games story.

              Since when did they NEED to innovate? I mean I could understand the argument for needing to vastly improve animations, facial expressions, etc. But they’re not Apple. Why change something that already works? Clearly Bethesda fans and even some critics don’t have a problem with the existing formula. Because it works. There’s nothing wrong with it, and it’s fun. And it’s not like Bethesda doesn’t introduce anything new to their games. The base building in Fallout 4 was the best fun I had with that game, and even that was a disappointment.

              Anything else?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        Eh? Point out at what point in my life I ever gave a shit about no man’s sky…

        Did you reply to the wrong person or…?

    • paraphrand
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      You’d think Bethesda would notice what you claim to have.

      That’s the point.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        No I wouldn’t think that, they’ve never acted in a manner that indicates that they have that capacity, why would I assume they do?

            • paraphrand
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              Well, we are talking about reviews here. They are opinions.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                01 year ago

                No, we’re talking about people who expect Bethesda to perform differently from historical record. How are you not even following the conversation you’re trying to be part of?

                • paraphrand
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  01 year ago

                  Good point. I escalated “why does everyone expect” to be centered around reviews. I’ve seen that thrown back at reviewers over and over this past week.

                  I did lose track of things. 👍

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      What’s the point of this comment? People are allowed to complain and criticize Bethesda for the things they seemingly refuse to improve on.