Many workers are faking knowledge of AI to make sure they aren’t left behind::There’s a need for more AI training, report finds

  • r00ty
    link
    fedilink
    2510 months ago

    Seems to me that while companies are bullshitting calling generic algorithms AI, it’s fine for the potentially employed to do the same.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1110 months ago

      I read an article the other day where an airline was breaking about using AI to predict how many passengers will buy a meal in flight based on how many people had historically bought a meal in flight.

      That’s… Literally just an average of how many people order a meal…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        210 months ago

        Ehhhhh there are much more sophisticated models than just an average. What a neural network could do is derive inferences based on a wide variety of inputs like time of day, country of origin, individual passenger characteristics, and so on.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          310 months ago

          Ultimately that application is just averaging over a smaller subset.

          While admittedly I don’t know that scenario myself, it looks like several scenarios I’ve seen where we imagined some magic insight from AI over more limited statistics, but not one of those scenarios ever predicted better.

          That’s not to say AI approaches are useless, but this sort of data when the dataset is pretty well organized and the required predictions are straightforward, then a pretty simple statistical analysis is plenty, and declaring “AI” for such a simple scenario just undermines AI credibility where it can do formerly infeasible things.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            You can basically think of AI as a massively multiverse analysis that can go far beyond a directly applied model. So while yes, technically averages are involved, they’re applied in a way that makes it incredibly naive to call it “just averages”.

            Edit: it is especially not “just an average of how many people order a meal” as you had said.

          • P03 Locke
            link
            fedilink
            English
            210 months ago

            AI models are averages, except in the form of weights over a large set of matrices. However, calling them “just averaging” is grossly oversimplifying how they work.

            • Prox
              link
              fedilink
              English
              110 months ago

              Most “AI” is just outcomes from machine learning.