• @LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    142 years ago

    In the study, 1,000,000 patients were treated by a male surgeon, and 100,000 treated by a female surgeon.

    That’s quite the discrepancy. Doesn’t explain the results, but it does show that there were far more male surgeons than female. Which might mean that there is a selection bias somewhere in the process.

    Lots more to study.

    • @Cypher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      The sample sizes are good and although improving the sample size for female surgeons would be nice it isn’t likely to be statistically important.

      • @julianwgs@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Having on one side the top 1,000,000 male surgeons and on the other side the top 100,000 female surgeons makes a difference, which is really hard to measure. Of course both are not the top surgeons, but it is just harder to find more of a kind. Imagine looking for 100,000,000 male surgeons, which is probably impossible given the education demographic in the US.