• xigoi
    link
    fedilink
    61 year ago

    No programming language is “natural/obvious/without effort”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      You could say that about anything. Of course you have to learn something the first time and it’s “unintuitive” then. Intuition is literally an expectation based on prior experience.

      Intuitive patterns exist in programming languages. For example, most conditionals are denoted with “if”, “else”, and “while”. You would find it intuitive if a new programming language adhered to that. You’d find it unintuitive if the conditionals were denoted with “dnwwkcoeo”, “wowpekg cneo”, and “coebemal”.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Languages also have inner consistency. E.g. the mentioned python len function is inconsistent with the rest of the same language - and that is a statement that is true in itself, without an external reference point.

      • xigoi
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yes, I agree that the len() thing in Python, and inconsistency in general, is bad. But pretty much all popular languages have many inconsistencies.

    • 257mOP
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      But there are languages that require varying degrees of effort to become natural. Something like Malbolge will pretty much never be natural while something like Python can become natural to you in a few days.

      • xigoi
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Yeah. The original comment was about programmers who say that a language is “unintuitive” because it doesn’t look like another language they know.