• GarbageShoot [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The general “tankie” position is that the people of Donbas, who mostly do not want to remain part of Ukraine, will not stop suffering attacks without Russia fighting Ukraine off. Russia does not seem interested in siphoning resources from or subjugating the people of Donbas, as they did not the people of Crimea, who merely became Russian citizens. This is very different from US carpetbombing for oil.

    • oce 🐆
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      US bombing is bad, but Russian bombing is ok? Why do you not apply the same critical spirit to both the USA war crimes and the Russian war crimes?

        • oce 🐆
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          If it constitutes war crimes according to neutral analysts, it’s not.

          • GarbageShoot [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            231 year ago

            There is no such thing as a neutral analyst but yes, even neoliberals talked about the civil war at one point and the Nazi problem and the pogroms and so on. Given this, and given the popular support Russia has among the people of that same region, and that it tried for 8 years to negotiate peaceful secession while Ukraine participated in those talks in bad faith, it sure seems like something very different from, and I cannot stress this enough, flying to the opposite side of the world to carpet bomb in the name of freedom and in the service of oil companies.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -11 year ago

          That’s no problem, we call all learn new things every day. You can read about the history of Conrad Henlein (?) and the politics of the annexation to understand the analogy here