@[email protected] to Atheist [email protected] • 1 year agoSo unnatural!feddit.itimagemessage-square53arrow-up11.21Karrow-down149
arrow-up11.16Karrow-down1imageSo unnatural!feddit.it@[email protected] to Atheist [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square53
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•1 year agoAt the time it was written, both women and girls were property. They were not something to be protected, except that if they were damaged the owner was to be compensated.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink0•1 year agoChildren and women were considered property at that time, so it makes sense to have used the words they did.
Removed by mod
At the time it was written, both women and girls were property. They were not something to be protected, except that if they were damaged the owner was to be compensated.
Children and women were considered property at that time, so it makes sense to have used the words they did.