Seems to my ignorant eyes that we could always somehow split the power received into more manageable units, even if it has to be splitted a million times, 🤷‍♂️.

  • some_guy
    link
    fedilink
    611 months ago

    No it’s not weird that we don’t talk about harnessing something that we can’t predict more than a few seconds in advance.

    Do you also think it’s weird we don’t plan our entire day to avoid getting hit by meteorites?

    • Bizarroland
      link
      fedilink
      11
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      You can farm lighting with a model rocket. Hell, the Empire State Building gets struck several times a year.

      We just don’t have anything that can capture and store that much power easily, and smoothing that power into stable, reliable energy would be harder than Matt Gaetz at a elementary school luncheon.

      • mrbubblesort
        link
        fedilink
        311 months ago

        harder than Matt Gaetz at a elementary school luncheon

        god-tier analogy right there

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      111 months ago

      I know you are sorta joking, but humans collectively have spent billions on mapping out our solar system with the explicit goal of predicting meteorites. There is active monitoring trying to see meteorites before they hit. And it is actually a fulltime job for a lot of people to plan for, scan for and predict meteor impacts.

      Good thing is, we are very good at it. We know pretty much for sure there isn’t going to be a big impact for the next 100 years caused by an object in our solar system. They are currently working on sizes that would cause a big issue if it were to hit a city. Of course chances such an impact would be in the ocean or a less densely area are big, but still it’s good to check.