• SpicyPeaSoup
    link
    fedilink
    011 months ago

    Unironically the most logical comment here. Aid to Ukraine is good, but we need to commit and go balls deep. No silly half-measure, attack russia where it hurts, especially those annoying-ass bombers and missile/drone factories.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1511 months ago

      What are you an Army general? I kinda would prefer the government not give any more reason for a nuclear strike by Russia. Which is absolutely where we’re trending if America starts dropping pretenses and begins directly arming incursions into Russian borders.

      • SpicyPeaSoup
        link
        fedilink
        -1111 months ago

        Russia only understands one language: violence.

        They need to be shown where their place is, and NATO’s combined might is more than capable of doing so. Hell, Ukraine with NATO’s leftovers is keeping russia at bay.

        If russia wants to go nuclear, so be it. They’ll be absolutely eradicated, so they won’t strike first.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1711 months ago

          If russia wants to go nuclear, so be it.

          Geez, NATO libs have really gone all in on nuclear armageddon won’t be all that bad actually. I’m sure you think you won’t be sent to the front lines if the US and NATO ends up in a multi front war with Russia, China, India, Brazil, multiple African nations, Cuba, Venezuela, and an ever growing list of other countries.

          Maybe we should just chill out and accept that we live in a multipolar world and work together for common goals instead of fighting pointless wars to enrich the shareholders and prop up capitalism for a few more years before it collapses under its inherent contradictions.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1411 months ago

          Okay armchair army general, I guess we’re going to nuclear war against a country on another continent that we’ve not technically declared war with because of your expert geopolitical analyst.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          They need to be shown where their place is

          You Americans talk like school bullies lmao.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          111 months ago

          Name on state or nation in the world that isn’t rooted in violence and that doesn’t have an army

      • SpicyPeaSoup
        link
        fedilink
        -911 months ago

        The US hasn’t threatened to nuke anyone, unlike russia. NATO doctrine states that we’d overwhelm russia with conventional means if they use a nuclear strike first, and russia knows that’s a fight it can’t win.

        Now go fuck yourself, you tankie cunt spunktard.

        • o_d [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          411 months ago

          The US is the only state to have ever used a nuclear weapon against another country.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -1
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            And that country had invaded China, Korea, Thailand, French Indochina, Indonesia (Dutch East Indies), Burma, Philippines, had plans to invade Australia, and committed genocide while murdering hundreds of thousands of people. This does not even consider with the war crimes that were committed against civilians, and the thousands of instances where they use chemical and biological weapons to murder untold numbers of people.

            Japan was a fascist country with an absolutely brutal military that had zero respect for any life. Their military leadership evem attempted to coup to dispose of their emperor after Hiroshima and Nagasaki were nuked, as they did not want the war to end at any cost.

            It’s a little difficult to find empathy for a culture who considers absolute loyalty to the emperor and the military a prerequisite for existence. A culture where you are expected to follow any order, including suicide on a moment’s notice.

            • o_d [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              011 months ago

              Did you really just write 3 paragraphs in defence of both vaporizing and radiation poisoning hundreds of thousands of civilians who mostly had literally nothing to do with the atrocities that you speak of? Disgusting.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                0
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                In a war that killed what, 50 million people? The US and Russia were gearing up to send roughly 10 million soldiers to invade Japan. That would have been far worse. Tens of millions would have died.

                In fact, to this day virtually every easy Asian nation that suffered from Japanese aggression had blamed Japan for the war and has sought a public apology, for which Japan has refused to give. It is a major sore spot in relations.

                So yes I did.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -211 months ago

              I find it hard to find empathy for ignorant Americans such as yourself but I don’t advocate murdering innocent civilians with a WMD because your government breaks international laws.