Cyber Ghost to [email protected] • 1 year ago“Both sides are the same. It is just a different perspective”i.imgur.comimagemessage-square49arrow-up1429arrow-down136
arrow-up1393arrow-down1image“Both sides are the same. It is just a different perspective”i.imgur.comCyber Ghost to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square49
minus-square10_0linkfedilink23•1 year agoJust get an NHS, oh wait Americans don’t want taxes and would rather get fleeced when they stub their toe.
minus-squaretakedalinkfedilink25•1 year agoThe irony is that the monthly insurance premiums that are paid are higher than the taxes would be.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•edit-21 year agoAND double the tax money per year for health, gdp adjusted.
minus-square🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️linkfedilinkEnglish10•edit-21 year agoI wanna see lobbies suffer the same fate as the lobby from The Matrix.
minus-squareTankiedesantski [he/him]cakelinkfedilinkEnglish7•1 year agoThe bourgeois “lobby” versus the proletarian “ground floor”.
minus-squareAwoo [she/her]linkfedilinkEnglish4•edit-21 year agoThey would have to spend like 1% less on bombs per year so that’s a no go.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•1 year agoActually, with less money going to healthcare profiteers, they would be able to spend more money on bombs.
Just get an NHS, oh wait Americans don’t want taxes and would rather get fleeced when they stub their toe.
The irony is that the monthly insurance premiums that are paid are higher than the taxes would be.
AND double the tax money per year for health, gdp adjusted.
deleted by creator
I wanna see lobbies suffer the same fate as the lobby from The Matrix.
deleted by creator
The bourgeois “lobby” versus the proletarian “ground floor”.
Freeeeeeeeeeeedddddddddoooooooooooommmm
They would have to spend like 1% less on bombs per year so that’s a no go.
Actually, with less money going to healthcare profiteers, they would be able to spend more money on bombs.
Aw fuck guess I’m anti-healthcare now then