@Wahots@pawb.social to Uplifting News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 months agoInvasive Crabs Have Taken Over New England. One Solution? Eat Them! - The New York Times (Free Article)www.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square13arrow-up191file-text
arrow-up184external-linkInvasive Crabs Have Taken Over New England. One Solution? Eat Them! - The New York Times (Free Article)www.nytimes.com@Wahots@pawb.social to Uplifting News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 months agomessage-square13file-text
minus-square@Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish5•2 months agoWait…you PROTECT the invasive species? Here in Cleveland we have an insect that everybody stomps in the summer. The only invasive species we like in Cleveland is Tim Misney. We KNOW what he does!
minus-squareDrusaslinkfedilink5•2 months agoStomping on them would be legal. The idea is to prevent people from spreading invasive species, but in this case, the law is backfiring because it’s not people spreading the invasive species. It’s already here and spreading on its own.
minus-square🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 🏆linkfedilinkEnglish2•2 months agoWhat if you smashed them then took them home to cook and eat? 🤔
minus-square@cashsky@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish2•2 months agoSeafood is better fresh. You wouldn’t be able to do that in large quantities and keep it from going bad quickly.
Wait…you PROTECT the invasive species? Here in Cleveland we have an insect that everybody stomps in the summer.
The only invasive species we like in Cleveland is Tim Misney. We KNOW what he does!
Stomping on them would be legal.
The idea is to prevent people from spreading invasive species, but in this case, the law is backfiring because it’s not people spreading the invasive species. It’s already here and spreading on its own.
What if you smashed them then took them home to cook and eat? 🤔
Seafood is better fresh. You wouldn’t be able to do that in large quantities and keep it from going bad quickly.