@ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to People Twitter@sh.itjust.worksEnglish • 3 months agoTwitter's filters for anybody out of the loopslrpnk.netimagemessage-square275arrow-up11.49K
arrow-up11.47KimageTwitter's filters for anybody out of the loopslrpnk.net@ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to People Twitter@sh.itjust.worksEnglish • 3 months agomessage-square275
minus-squareJerkface (any/all)linkfedilinkEnglish23•edit-23 months agoExactly the opposite lesson to take. We need public social media, not corporate social media. We need rights and guarantees, not profit taking and psyops.
minus-square@explodicle@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish5•3 months agoI like having a bunch of nonprofits because if one turns bad, I can switch. Your idea will work better if the state becomes controlled by the public.
minus-square@ubergeek@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglish3•3 months agoStates are never controlled by the public, or the working class, to be more precise. States exists to protect the interest of oligarchs. Nothing more, nothing less.
minus-square@fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglish4•3 months agoI think in 2025 the “rights and guarantees” you want aren’t going to be provided by state or corporate social. Defederated / self hosted is the way.
minus-square@DarkFuture@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish4•3 months agoDon’t use state media controlled by a single megalomaniac man-child.
minus-square@Donkter@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•3 months agoI would argue that no longer qualifies as state media.
minus-square@ubergeek@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglish3•3 months agoBecause the government of the US is very well known for letting dissenting voices have a soap box…
minus-square@demizerone@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink2•3 months agoIt should be owned by the users and moderators, not the billionaires.
Exactly the opposite lesson to take. We need public social media, not corporate social media. We need rights and guarantees, not profit taking and psyops.
I like having a bunch of nonprofits because if one turns bad, I can switch. Your idea will work better if the state becomes controlled by the public.
States are never controlled by the public, or the working class, to be more precise.
States exists to protect the interest of oligarchs. Nothing more, nothing less.
I think in 2025 the “rights and guarantees” you want aren’t going to be provided by state or corporate social. Defederated / self hosted is the way.
Don’t use state media controlled by a single megalomaniac man-child.
I would argue that no longer qualifies as state media.
Because the government of the US is very well known for letting dissenting voices have a soap box…
It should be owned by the users and moderators, not the billionaires.