• Ech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    302 months ago

    Depends on the target. Stores? Probably fine. Sticking to chains instead of local shops would be cooler, though. People’s homes? Nah. That’s shitty. Taking advantage of people in an emergency is some CEO level mentality.

    • Syl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      162 months ago

      what if the home belongs to a uhc executive?

    • @Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      32 months ago

      If you’re looting TVs, you’re making the evacuation worse, but I don’t care if you’re just grabbing food or supplies. I’d absolutely break some windows if I needed jumper cables for instance.

      • @Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        222 months ago

        Altadena–where the images of the “looting” are coming from–is not Pacific Palisades. Living in LA county doesn’t mean you’re rich, and most people in Altadena weren’t.

        It’s a racially diverse neighborhood that historically wasn’t redlined, representing one of the few areas in LA where black families were able to build equity instead of perpetually renting. It’s not an accident that these ghouls are showing black people fleeing from their homes with what they can carry and calling it looting, and it’s going to get people fucking killed.

      • Ech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 months ago

        Easy to fall into a “this person looks richer than me” justification with that one. Anything below a super-mansion should just be considered off limits for anyone with a conscience.