nukeM to [email protected]English • edit-21 year agoWe live in the dumbest timelinesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square92arrow-up1689file-text
arrow-up1686imageWe live in the dumbest timelinesh.itjust.worksnukeM to [email protected]English • edit-21 year agomessage-square92file-text
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-4•1 year agoAs the other reply mentioned, it’s “Controlled Unclassified Information” so it’s in the name, unclassified.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•1 year agoThat’s not what that means. You’ve been told what it means.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-4•1 year agoYes, and, like my first comment t said, it’s technically not classified.
minus-squarenukeOPMlinkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-21 year agoYou’re still wrong and at this point, getting fucking annoying
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•1 year agoSure, whatever, if it means that much to you.
minus-squarenukeOPMlinkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-21 year agoThat’s how we enforce Rule 7. By actually knowing what classified means.
minus-square...m...linkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year ago…technically, it’s not not classified, it’s unclassified… …does unclassified require something to have first been classified?..semantically, certainly, but technically i have no idea…
As the other reply mentioned, it’s “Controlled Unclassified Information” so it’s in the name, unclassified.
That’s not what that means. You’ve been told what it means.
Yes, and, like my first comment t said, it’s technically not classified.
You’re still wrong and at this point, getting fucking annoying
Sure, whatever, if it means that much to you.
That’s how we enforce Rule 7. By actually knowing what classified means.
…technically, it’s not not classified, it’s unclassified…
…does unclassified require something to have first been classified?..semantically, certainly, but technically i have no idea…
Troll
deleted by creator