@[email protected] to Comic [email protected]English • 1 year agoPurposelemmy.caimagemessage-square19arrow-up1626file-text
arrow-up1622imagePurposelemmy.ca@[email protected] to Comic [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square19file-text
minus-squarego $fsck yourselflinkfedilinkEnglish10•1 year agoOriginal is 1.47mb. OP’s is 0.47mb. That’s about 3x smaller and it’s a significant difference in clarity. It’s fine if that doesn’t matter to you, but don’t spew shitty info just because you don’t care about the difference.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink0•1 year agoOP’s pic was fine, the quality was good enough for what it is, and it only used 1/3 of the space and bandwidth on the server.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•edit-21 year ago“Won’t anyone think of the bandwidth of the poor server?” Screw that, give us the high quality stuff. Shit would almost fit onto a floppy disk. 1.47mb is nothing.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish0•1 year agoQuality snob* here Totally fine *not really, just reverse image search JPG’d images and post originals when I notice something’s ugly
Original is 1.47mb. OP’s is 0.47mb. That’s about 3x smaller and it’s a significant difference in clarity.
It’s fine if that doesn’t matter to you, but don’t spew shitty info just because you don’t care about the difference.
OP’s pic was fine, the quality was good enough for what it is, and it only used 1/3 of the space and bandwidth on the server.
“Won’t anyone think of the bandwidth of the poor server?”
Screw that, give us the high quality stuff. Shit would almost fit onto a floppy disk. 1.47mb is nothing.
Quality snob* here
Totally fine
*not really, just reverse image search JPG’d images and post originals when I notice something’s ugly