@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected]English • 1 year agoThanks for the warning I guess??lemmy.worldimagemessage-square77arrow-up1750
arrow-up1717imageThanks for the warning I guess??lemmy.world@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square77
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink37•1 year agoI really hate that “no one:” shit, it often doesn’t make any sense to me.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink11•1 year agoIt’s just a qualifier to insinuate that no one cares about a certain topic and then there’s that one person that brings it up out of no where.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink13•edit-21 year agoShouldn’t it be “everybody: <blank>” then? Nobody: <blank> means that everyone has some feelings about it. If it’s Nobody and the second line applying to the same thing then the nobody part is false, because the second bit implies that at least one person feels that way. I just don’t get it, logically.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink4•1 year ago“Nobody has said anything” sounds a bit better than “everyone has said nothing”, which is about how it should be interpreted.
How to improve a meme in one easy step
I really hate that “no one:” shit, it often doesn’t make any sense to me.
No one:
[email protected]:
It’s just a qualifier to insinuate that no one cares about a certain topic and then there’s that one person that brings it up out of no where.
Shouldn’t it be “everybody: <blank>” then?
Nobody: <blank> means that everyone has some feelings about it.
If it’s Nobody and the second line applying to the same thing then the nobody part is false, because the second bit implies that at least one person feels that way.
I just don’t get it, logically.
“Nobody has said anything” sounds a bit better than “everyone has said nothing”, which is about how it should be interpreted.