• ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4420 hours ago

    Unironically, I think that was the thought process.

    Hard to vote for someone who is telling you all is well and the people that got the country here are competent and mean well, when the country is going through 5 different crises, all preventing you from living a decent life.

    • FlashMobOfOne
      link
      fedilink
      1118 hours ago

      Exactly. Harris was tasked with defending and indefensible record. It’s that simple.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1016 hours ago

        She didn’t have to defend it. This was an election to run over Biden until he was just a pile of goo. She could have came out with some strong contrasting policies, instead she gave some great sound bytes for Trump.

        • @djsoren19
          link
          fedilink
          26 hours ago

          It was such an easy lay-up to fumble. Hell, she raised millions in personal donations compared to a Trump campaign that ended up stiffing locations on payment because they’re so broke, it was the rare election where the Dems didn’t need their corporate donors. They could have accepted some long-term financial losses in the face of potential greater long-term gains if they could maintain similar levels of personal donations from energized progressives. I remember the energy in the air when Harris/Walz was revealed, it seemed like a progressive ticket could seriously exist.

          And then it all vanished. Thanks for taking my $20, assholes. Wouldn’t have bothered if I knew they’d just dance to their owners demands anyway.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            25 hours ago

            Fumbling what should have been a cupcake question to talk about a major campaign promise is inexcusable.