@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 2 days agoInfintiy Infintiy Infintiy Infintiy Infintiy Infintiy Infintiy Infintiymander.xyzimagemessage-square138arrow-up11.13Karrow-down115
arrow-up11.12Karrow-down1imageInfintiy Infintiy Infintiy Infintiy Infintiy Infintiy Infintiy Infintiymander.xyz@[email protected]M to Science [email protected]English • 2 days agomessage-square138
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish12•1 day agoMonkeys are a social construct. Like trees.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish5•23 hours agoIf trees aren’t real, how can our birds be real? …I am so sorry
minus-squareEnkrodlinkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-21 day agoSimiiformes is a clear and distinct clade. There is no such thing for trees, because “tree” is a botanical classification, not a cladistical one.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•20 hours ago Simiiformes is a clear and distinct clade. Yes but who says that specific clade maps to the colloquial taxonomic word “monkey”?
Monkeys are a social construct. Like trees.
If trees aren’t real, how can our birds be real?
…I am so sorry
Simiiformes is a clear and distinct clade.
There is no such thing for trees, because “tree” is a botanical classification, not a cladistical one.
Yes but who says that specific clade maps to the colloquial taxonomic word “monkey”?