Nemeski to [email protected] • 1 month agoSF ads call out tech firms for not paying for open sourcewww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square22arrow-up1154arrow-down12cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1152arrow-down1external-linkSF ads call out tech firms for not paying for open sourcewww.theregister.comNemeski to [email protected] • 1 month agomessage-square22cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-square🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️linkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-21 month ago makes thing for free Doesn’t get paid for it Why not make a license that makes it free if you contribute to development and paid for if you don’t?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•1 month agoBecause for those using it non commercially it would be prohibitively expensive.
Why not make a license that makes it free if you contribute to development and paid for if you don’t?
Because for those using it non commercially it would be prohibitively expensive.