Nemeski to [email protected] • 1 day agoSF ads call out tech firms for not paying for open sourcewww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square18arrow-up1118arrow-down12cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1116arrow-down1external-linkSF ads call out tech firms for not paying for open sourcewww.theregister.comNemeski to [email protected] • 1 day agomessage-square18cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-8•1 day agoI hope this Doesn’t catch on. It is open for a reason. Damn drama makers.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish12•edit-21 day agoYou hope the idea that “commerical companies that have profited off of FOSS feel compelled and pledge to contribute to the maintainence and development of those projects” doesn’t catch on? Why?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•7 hours agoI think he meant the idea of shaming companies for not donating to things.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•6 hours agoYeah, kinda funny that I further the idea of open being fully open, and get downvoted. In an open source community. Funny.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink0•6 hours agoOpen is open, should have as few strings attached as possible.
I hope this Doesn’t catch on. It is open for a reason. Damn drama makers.
You hope the idea that “commerical companies that have profited off of FOSS feel compelled and pledge to contribute to the maintainence and development of those projects” doesn’t catch on?
Why?
I think he meant the idea of shaming companies for not donating to things.
Yeah, kinda funny that I further the idea of open being fully open, and get downvoted. In an open source community. Funny.
Open is open, should have as few strings attached as possible.