• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4016 hours ago

    This knowledge comes in handy with marketing BS around CPU coolers. If an aftermarket cooler gets a CPU to 35C when the stock cooler is at 70C, marketing will sometimes claim it cut temperatures in half.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      I mean… that’s literally half though

      edit: I am not a science man and I am in over my head in this argument

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        to make the argument even simpler, that phrase wouldn’t even mean the same thing to an english person as it would to an american.

        In fahrenheit those temps would convert to 95f and 158f.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          10 minutes ago

          But °C was mentioned in the units, and its well understood that 0°C is a cold temperature for humans.

          I’m not a fan of marketing doublespeak either, but I think the right scale and right terminology was used here. They cut the temperature in half, in Celsius, on the basis that 0°C is very cold.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        109 hours ago

        If you convert those temperatures to Kelvin, they become 308K and 343K. Since Kelvin is absolute and we’re measuring the same material, this tells you how much more thermal energy is there and their actual proportion to each other.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          48 hours ago

          thanks, this makes a lot more sense.

          That being said, 70C down to 35C is a huge difference, relative to the temperature ranges we live in

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        910 hours ago

        But it’s not.

        Celsius and Faernheit are interval scales, not rational scales. The absolute change from one number to the next is consistent, but since you can go into the negatives, 1 is not double 2.

        Kelvin and Rankine are rational because they use an absolute zero.