I’ve seen a lot of people who quite dislike Manjaro, and I’m not really sure why. I’m myself am not a Manjaro user, but I did use it for quite a while and enjoyed my experienced, as it felt almost ready out of the box. I’m not here to judge, just wanted to hear the opinion of the community on the matter. Thanks!

  • Garbage Data
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 years ago

    I heard that the maintainers let some important web certificates expire, which is a big no-no.

    • @guyman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      Doesn’t really affect most end-users in a practical way. But I get it, that slippery slope.

  • zlatiah
    link
    fedilink
    32 years ago

    Opinion you said?.. https://manjarno.snorlax.sh/

    Thankfully the Manjaro team didn’t seem to have a major mess-up recently, but they did have some very troubled past. Especially now that Arch has a real installer that bundles entire DEs for you, the premise of using an “Arch Linux but easy to use” OS seems less and less

    To each their own though! Nothing wrong with using Manjaro at all if someone really likes it

  • @Sebo@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22 years ago

    I enjoy Manjaro and I would even say its the reason I switched to linux (I didn’t like the other distros) but I’ve had updates that brick my operating system however this isnt so much of a problem for me now since i back up my data and use timeshift now.

    I think most of the Manjaro hate comes from people comparing it to arch linux

  • @nivenkos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22 years ago

    It seems alright but I’ve seen a lot of issues.

    Back when I contributed to ALMA - we’d constantly get issues created by Manjaro users, as it wouldn’t work due to Manjaro having the kernel package set up differently IIRC.

    I’d just use Arch Linux tbh, it’s only painful the first time.

    • @IUsedTo@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 years ago

      I’d just use Arch Linux tbh, it’s only painful the first time.

      Makes sense. There’s nothing wrong with vanilla Arch. But may I ask, why should someone use vanilla Arch instead of Arch based like Endevour? Not judging or anything, I’m just not sure if there are any advantages for using vanilla Arch?

      • @CaptainJack42@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Endavour or arch doesn’t really make a difference imo, endavour uses the exact arch repos and only has an extra repo with stuff like AUR helpers, pre-configured DEs and a special script for properly setting up nvidia-dkms drivers.

        The main benefit of using/installing arch at least once is that you’ll learn quite a bit about the workings of the system. I did a manual arch install a few times and these days I usually just install endavour for the sensible defaults and pre installed QoL packages that I’m too lazy to search for and install on arch.

  • Joe Average
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22 years ago

    It’s fine. Sometimes an update breaks the stuff installed via aur, that’s fixable by issuing a command like that:

    yay -S $(pacman -Qoq /usr/lib/python3.11) --answerclean All

    Otherwise it works rocksolid. I’ve got it for 2 years on my thinkpad and no issues. Are there better Arch like distros? Probably. Would I choose another distro like Endeavour OS when I have to make fresh install? Probably. But until then, its okay.

  • Scraft161
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22 years ago

    Manjaro is what happens when you have a really nice installer for arch linux and some neat extras; but it’s made by people who looked at a 20 minute youtube tutorial about the subject and think they’re now the best in their subject even though they barely know how to refresh their own domain name.

    if you want an arch-like experience use something like XeroxLinux, arco linux, or EndeavourOS instead, they all have their own place in the arch space and are way better at teaching you how to actually use and maintain your system rather than throw some system at it that will break because it is barely maintained and arch is a rolling release distro.

    Brodie Robertson on youtube did a series of videos on the different fuckups by the manjaro team ranging from not refreshing their domain name, DDOS-ing the AUR with their tooling, and pushing broken patches upstream with a rat’s ass of knowledge of what’s actually going on.

  • @plexnose@u.fail
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 years ago

    Too many instances of poor management, and the 2 week package delay issue.

    Doesn’t seem to be a good reason to use it when Endeavour exists.

  • @lalay721@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Manjaro was the first Linux distro I used as a daily driver, from October 2020 to July 2021, when I switched to EndeavourOS. To be fair the main reason I switched was all those previous mess-ups by the developers and the troubled past, which I didn’t know of when I moved to Linux. In the year or so I used it, I didn’t have any messed update or crash myself.

    I would say it’s still a fine distro for beginners who want to try a rolling release (as EndeavourOS is imho better in every way, but it doesn’t come with any GUI package manager so I wouldn’t call it a distro for absolute beginners), but can’t see any other usage case, as it’s especially risky if you want to use packages from the AUR.

  • SweetAIBelle
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    I have heard things previously about Manjaro that make me want to avoid it.

    OTOH, as an Arch user, some of the things I feel could use improvement are better with Manjaro. Pretty much every Arch derivative does something about the major pain points of Arch, though, slapping on a installation gui (though, honestly, just advertising the archinstall CLI script that’s on the install usb stick and fixing it up a bit would help Arch), and giving you an AUR helper by default.

    I recently tried the XFCE version of Endeavor in a vm, and I quite like it, so if I move from Arch, I’m more inclined to go that direction.

  • exohuman
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    I tried it on bare metal some years ago. The main issue I had was that it wasn’t very stable and I kept running into bugs that made the system hard to use. I’m sure they have fixed that by now but that was my experience.

  • feyo
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    I like the idea and used Manjaro for a few years, but its run by less competent people than Id like (or at least in comparison to other distros), so I stopped and moved to a different distro.

  • @20gramsWrench@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 years ago

    I doesn’t deserve the hate it gets, it’s not that big of a project but it’s being treated like it pushed kids to kill themselves, the devs fucked up a few times and made some questionable decision (freeoffice…) but they put upe a nice working distro and aren’t completely insane like the gnome/ubuntu devs

  • @ToxicBuilt@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 years ago

    In my opinion, people should just use Arch with the archinstall script if they need help or EndeavourOS for an easy GUI installer.