• NaevaTheRat [she/her]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    355 days ago

    Before synthetic gemstones were trendy and they were truly worthless I bought 5 massive sapphires for like 3 dollars each.

    They’re on my desk, I see them every day. Every time I play with them I muse about how not so long ago people murdered each other for gems so large and so perfect. Now that anyone can have them though, they’re toys.

    Gems were always about status, nobody aside from nerds every wanted them because they were beautiful, or because their physical properties and fascinating. Showing how much ‘better’ you are than someone else was worth more than human lives.

    I don’t think new methods for making diamond will really help anyone, the nutters will just find new ways to flaunt their power.

    • celeste
      link
      fedilink
      125 days ago

      I think rich people collect art, these days, right? For inflated prices. And, like, limited wines. Maybe I’m thinking of money launderers.

      • NaevaTheRat [she/her]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        105 days ago

        If you give me your address and pay shipping. Although if you want sick gems the coolest thing you can do is buy rejected lab rough (grade inferior for lasers and shit), and then take it to your local lapidary club and facet it yourself.

        I faceted this into trillion but it’s too dark to have much brilliance.

  • This just in!

    I’m a freak accident, a jet plane owned by De Beers Group crashed into the lab, killing all but one member of the team responsible for this discovery. In an unrelated event, the final member, who was not in the lab when the plane crashed, accidentally stumbled on front of an oncoming subway train.

    In a press release, a De Beers representative is quoted as saying, “Oopsie!”

        • NaevaTheRat [she/her]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          9
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          No! good question though, but it misses a detail of their molecular geometry/energy structure.

          They’re both allotropes (different forms) of carbon but the way they are arranged atomically is different. Like soot is basically just random balls of carbon (??? bonds), graphite is rings bonded in a plane (3 bonds, a single layer of which is called graphene), and diamond is a network that extends in 3 dimensions with each atom bonded to 4 carbon atoms.

          When you grind them up you are more making smaller and smaller shards of the base material than changing it’s energetic structure, although at the edges it is changing. If you grind pathologically I suppose you would eventually reduce it all to soot.

          The physical properties of stuff is in part altered by the surface configuration when we get extremely small, but in general we just consider the bulk as even tensie tiny fragments of stuff are thousands (tens, hundreds of depending on geometry) of atoms, of which only a handful have different bonds at the edge.