• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -4420 hours ago

    I am very disturbed by mean words on a flag and a naval blockade in protest to an ongoing genocide.

    Hmmm

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      54
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      “Naval blockade” here meaning “attacking random civilian ships in international waters because they MIGHT be Jews”

      Yes, I am sure this is how a naval blockade against a particular country works, you just pick a handful of civilian ships at random to shoot at and claim they were secretly part of your enemies. War crimes are okay when it’s Your Side (and apparently, your side is the Islamofascists, very curious)

      EDIT: Of course, they’re a Tiananmen Square denier too. How predictable.

            • @[email protected]OP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3220 hours ago

              Stop blockading the genociders!

              Yes, the genociders like [checks notes] Greece, China, and India.

              Maybe if you attack enough civilians, you’ll accidentally hit some Israelis. Keep going!

                • @[email protected]OP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  2420 hours ago

                  So how many innocent blockade runners have died vs innocent civilians been genocided?

                  I guess “Intentionally targeting civilians and committing war crimes is bad” sounds like radical shitlib stuff to you, as long as the people you claim to oppose (but are targeting and killing people entirely unrelated to them) are committing more war crimes.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -2120 hours ago

                    Real leftists understand that ending a genocide will require more than asking nicely and sending more weapons. Must sound completely unhinged to the libs.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31
          edit-2
          20 hours ago

          Doing more to stop a genocide than the western powers sending weapons.

          “By killing Fillipino civilian sailors heading to Saudi Arabia, this will finally stop the genocide of Palestinians by Israel!”

          Have fun with your war crimes.

          How many war crimes on balance?

          ‘on balance’?

          What, is this some kind of fucking game to you? “They committed war crimes, so we can commit so war crimes too”? Jesus fucking Christ. How utterly morally bankrupt.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              45 hours ago

              “Whoever commits fewer war crimes is moral and whatever war crimes they did were good and justified.” Quite logical.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              3420 hours ago

              Somebody killing people doesn’t give you a right to kill random unrelated people, just because you are killing fewer people

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1418 hours ago

              Murdering civilians intentionally is inexcusable regardless of how many.

              By your logic literally every genocide the US supported and engaged in would have been completely excused had they just struck the right KD ratio by throwing their death row inmates at the enemy first.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1818 hours ago

      Murdering filipinos to upset the israelis. Yes, totally a naval blockade and not just unhinged terrorism.