• @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        53
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        We watched him collude with Russia on national TV with our own eyes. Whatever links you have will never undo that.

      • Digital_Prophet
        link
        fedilink
        47
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Lol “Id like to push back by linking two youtube videos, one from the hill and the other from RNN.”

        We only accept infowars and parler links as legitimate sources, sorry!

        edit: And pornhub links!

        • ElleChaise
          link
          fedilink
          138 months ago

          The weird thing here is that when you run these sources through one of those media bias websites, TRNN says ‘far left bias’, and The Hill says ‘slight left bias’. Are these bias sites blind; or am I just missing what having a ‘left bias’ means? Is there some far-left plan by whatever think tank to make me want to support this idea, which I very much do not support? An idea which usually falls under the ‘extreme right-wing’ category, no less? What the hell?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            278 months ago

            that’s the ‘crypto’ part. hidden. they pretend to be leftist yet always attack leftists and never corporate or right wing. disinformation artists and grifters.

          • Lemminary
            link
            fedilink
            26
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            That other person with the links likes to listen to weird conspiracy theories, particularly Jimmy Dore. Check the communities they moderate. I wouldn’t put too much thought into what they post and comment, tbh.

            And they always act like they’re so enlightened and unfased when they get called out, it’s kind of eerie.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -338 months ago

          Not sure what you are on about…

          This is the internet, once in a while you may run into subjects you don’t agree with.

          Many well-known and respected independent journalists have discussed this subject at length.

          • @[email protected]M
            link
            fedilink
            28 months ago

            What I’m saying is, he continues to have a vested interest in disproving Russiagate. I’d be more interested in hearing what someone completely disconnected from Russia has to say about it.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              08 months ago

              Ah, okay.

              Only a few are that ou spoken, and they all get labeled far-right or russian asset.

              Same as the whistleblowers, which are human with bias in them.

      • TigrisMorte
        link
        fedilink
        78 months ago

        Pure garbage that undoubtedly references each other as “proof”.
        45, and a large portion of the Republican conference is in pootie’s pocket.