The numbers are the placeholders in my statement for the concepts. Each of the concepts you’re calling out has a number attached to it in my citation. If you refuse to acknowledge the numbers, simply use them as placeholders for the concepts as they are 1:1.
I’m not refusing to acknowledge the numbers I just think the numbers relate to something that has nothing to do with the topic. Hence why I think you’re making a logical leap. You’ve taken numbers that relate to one fact and assumed they must also relate to another with nothing actual to connect them.
Read my post again, please. I said: “from 45% to 69%”. I accounted for the 69% at the maximum, while recognizing the lower percentage.
My issue wasn’t the numbers, it was the concept.
The numbers are the placeholders in my statement for the concepts. Each of the concepts you’re calling out has a number attached to it in my citation. If you refuse to acknowledge the numbers, simply use them as placeholders for the concepts as they are 1:1.
I’m not refusing to acknowledge the numbers I just think the numbers relate to something that has nothing to do with the topic. Hence why I think you’re making a logical leap. You’ve taken numbers that relate to one fact and assumed they must also relate to another with nothing actual to connect them.